<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life &#187; Roman law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.ellerman.org/tag/roman-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org</link>
	<description>An interdisciplinary blog on the human sciences and current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why was Slavery Wrong? Involuntariness or Treating Persons as Things?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/02/why-was-slavery-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/02/why-was-slavery-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienable natural rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pufendorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renting people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seabury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary slavery contract]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Involuntariness&#8221; is the usual answer. Indeed, classical liberalism takes the most basic framing of a social question as: &#8220;consent or coercion?&#8221;  In this view, democracy is characterized as government &#8220;with the consent of the governed&#8221; so slavery and non-democratic government were both condemned for the lack of consent. This common condemnation of slavery on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/02/why-was-slavery-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

