<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life &#187; Nozick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.ellerman.org/tag/nozick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org</link>
	<description>An interdisciplinary blog on the human sciences and current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inalienable Rights: Part I The Basic Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatal Flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inalienable rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nontransferability of human action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nontransferability of human decision-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal alienation contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the inalienable rights theory that descends from the Reformation through the Enlightenment and that answers the classical apologies for slavery and autocracy based on implicit or explicit voluntary contracts?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Non-democratic Government Wrong? Involuntariness or Treating Persons as Things?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/why-is-non-democratic-government-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/why-is-non-democratic-government-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienable natural rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent vs. coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegation vs. alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gierke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grotius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lex regia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pactum subjectionis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Aquinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translatio vs. concessio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Democracy Government based only on the Consent of the Governed? Classical liberalism takes the most basic question about a social institution as: &#8220;consent or coercion.&#8221; Democracy is often characterized as &#8220;government based on the consent of the governed&#8221; so non-democratic government is then typically condemned as being involuntary and coercive. This common condemnation of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/why-is-non-democratic-government-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why was Slavery Wrong? Involuntariness or Treating Persons as Things?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/02/why-was-slavery-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/02/why-was-slavery-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienable natural rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pufendorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renting people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seabury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary slavery contract]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Involuntariness&#8221; is the usual answer. Indeed, classical liberalism takes the most basic framing of a social question as: &#8220;consent or coercion?&#8221;  In this view, democracy is characterized as government &#8220;with the consent of the governed&#8221; so slavery and non-democratic government were both condemned for the lack of consent. This common condemnation of slavery on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/02/why-was-slavery-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

