<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life &#187; employment contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.ellerman.org/tag/employment-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org</link>
	<description>An interdisciplinary blog on the human sciences and current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inalienable Rights: Part III A Litmus Test for Liberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/inalienable-rights-part-iii-a-litmus-test-for-liberalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/inalienable-rights-part-iii-a-litmus-test-for-liberalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fatal Flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inalienable rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Rawls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montesquieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pact of subjection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-rental contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-sale contract]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely it is not too much to ask a modern liberal theory of justice that it provide a coherent account of why some contracts, e.g., self-sale contract, should be deemed invalid and why the rights such contracts would legally alienate are inalienable. In that sense, the theory of inalienable rights provides a historical litmus test for liberalism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/inalienable-rights-part-iii-a-litmus-test-for-liberalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Non-democratic Government Wrong? Involuntariness or Treating Persons as Things?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/why-is-non-democratic-government-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/why-is-non-democratic-government-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienable natural rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent vs. coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegation vs. alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gierke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grotius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lex regia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pactum subjectionis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Aquinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translatio vs. concessio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Democracy Government based only on the Consent of the Governed? Classical liberalism takes the most basic question about a social institution as: &#8220;consent or coercion.&#8221; Democracy is often characterized as &#8220;government based on the consent of the governed&#8221; so non-democratic government is then typically condemned as being involuntary and coercive. This common condemnation of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/why-is-non-democratic-government-wrong-involuntariness-or-treating-persons-as-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are  the self-sale and self-rental contracts on the same moral footing?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/are-the-self-sale-and-self-rental-contracts-on-the-same-moral-footing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/are-the-self-sale-and-self-rental-contracts-on-the-same-moral-footing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Ellerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Philmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rothbard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renting people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specific performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary slavery contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.ellerman.org/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neverfox's comment to my last post, Why Was Slavery Wrong?, was so rich that I will reply by this new posting, rather than just a comment on the comment. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.ellerman.org/2010/03/are-the-self-sale-and-self-rental-contracts-on-the-same-moral-footing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

